Trump’s Great Reset at the WEF - Top 3 Takeaways January 22nd, 2026
Takeaway #1: He isn’t going away
Yesterday President Trump made his way to Davos to address the peeps who’ve conspired to do things like “Reset” the world’s economy. For those who may not recall or who have never known, since the pandemic the World Economic Forum has operated like something straight out of Revelation. The World Economic Forum is where in 2020 they finally unveiled their plan for a one world government and collectivism known as “The Great Reset”. As was published by the WEF on June 3rd, 2020: To achieve a better outcome, the world must act jointly and swiftly to revamp all aspects of our societies and economies, from education to social contracts and working conditions. Every country, from the United States to China, must participate, and every industry, from oil and gas to tech, must be transformed. In short, we need a “Great Reset” of capitalism. Ahh yes, because capitalism was the problem. The WEF’s socialist push called for a focus on diversity and “equitable” outcomes. Just as any good one-world socialist agenda would do. And for years the WEF’s agenda thrived as DEI became a rallying cry for the political Left around the world. It was one implemented and injected into our society through corporate America and the political Left. That’s because their agenda had become the World Economic Forum’s agenda – rather than a focus on best serving their constituencies. That was true of the political Left and of corporate America. But last year, with the return of President Trump, their plan was turned on its head with what I called Trump’s Great Reset. A year later, the microsite the World Economic Forum setup for “The Great Reset” is gone, they’ve taken it down. Wokeism is still everywhere on the Left, but as their brains continue to break in this country, they have instead turned their attention to protesting “NoKings” from promoting drag queens and “Ice Out” has replaced BLMing (it’s all about anarchy and defunding police). It may not always feel like it, but Trump’s Great Reset is winning. If you doubt this, consider this...demand to be in the room for Trump’s speech was so high that in order for the elites and world leaders attending the World Economic Forum to gain a seat they literally stood in line for 90 minutes. That included people like Apple CEO Tim Cook, Blackstone’s CEO and Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney. And still hundreds of attendees who stood in line for all of that time were denied entry into the room that seated around 1,000. As for the address... For an hour and ten minutes resident Trump addressed the WEF and in no uncertain terms laid out his vision, talked up the U.S.’s economic position and made it clear that in terms of his desire to obtain Greenland for the United States...the issue isn’t going away. During his speech he demanded...” Immediate negotiations”. He continued by saying that only the U.S. is capable for adequately defending Greenland from the looming threats it faces (Russia and China). Then he said this... What I’m asking for is a piece of Ice. So, they have a choice. You can say yes (to allowing the U.S. to acquire Greenland), and we will be very appreciative. Or you can say no, and we will remember. The president also said...
Takeaway #2: He won’t use force
I must admit that for as long as I’ve studied TDS, I still haven’t figured it all out. For example, I understand why the Frenchman Emanuel Macron broke out his shades inside of the WEF to address the press (which hilariously didn’t go unnoticed by Trump btw). I understand why the EU panicked over the weekend and called an “emergency meeting” out of fear for Trump’s desire to acquire Greenland. But for the life of me what I still struggle to see is how it is that even woke and wussified world leaders could seriously think that Donald Trump would be bombing dog sleds. The biggest news being reported around the world from the president’s address was this: We never asked for anything, and we never got anything. We probably won’t get anything unless I decide to use excessive strength and force, where we would be, frankly, unstoppable. But I won’t do that. Okay? Now everyone’s saying, ‘Oh, good.’ That’s probably the biggest statement I made, because people thought I would use force. I don’t have to use force. I don’t want to use force. I won’t use force. That comment led to countless news stories, a rally in the financial markets, and expressed relief from attendees at the WEF. It’s hard to believe that people that are to be taken seriously honestly thought that Trump would go about bombing the Great Danes to gain control of Greenland. That must be a byproduct of long-term TDS. Yet still...
Takeaway #3: Take Him Seriously
I don’t know how the story with Greenland will end but I do know that President Trump has a long history of saying what he means and following through. As Trump has brought his desire for Greenland to the forefront out of expressed long-term concerns for national security, Denmark and the EU are downplaying the threat China and Russia pose to the semi-autonomous Danish territory. Some have gone so far as to say that there haven’t been Chinese or Russian vessels in proximity to Greenland for years. Yet it was just in December that Denmark’s Intelligence Service published this an annual report: Russia sees itself in conflict with NATO and is launching hybrid attacks against the Alliance, including sabotage and destructive cyber attacks. The Russian military is also adopting an increasingly threatening posture in Denmark’s neighbouring region. While Russia continues its military build-up, and China continues to develop its capacity to operate both submarines and surface vessels in the region. So, who’s really telling the truth? And what did we learn from Russia when they lined up forces outside of Ukraine’s border? Europe was dumb enough to believe Joe Biden when he first said that Russia wouldn’t invade Ukraine because the U.S. would impose strong sanctions. And later when it was clear that Russia was about to invade Ukraine and he spoke of a “minor incursion”. How did that work out for them? And if according to Denmark’s own intelligence agency Russia and China are building up military assets with a “threatening posture” in the region what does that mean? The NATO and WEF pinheads should take President Putin seriously...which is why they should take President Trump seriously. And maybe, just maybe that’s starting to happen. Shortly after President Trump’s Q&A yesterday he Truthed this: Based upon a very productive meeting that I have had with the Secretary General of NATO, Mark Rutte, we have formed the framework of a future deal with respect to Greenland and, in fact, the entire Arctic Region. This solution, if consummated, will be a great one for the United States of America, and all NATO Nations. Based upon this understanding, I will not be imposing the Tariffs that were scheduled to go into effect on February 1st. Additional discussions are being held concerning The Golden Dome as it pertains to Greenland. Further information will be made available as discussions progress. Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Special Envoy Steve Witkoff, and various others, as needed, will be responsible for the negotiations — They will report directly to me. Thank you for your attention to this matter! “Framework for a future deal” is a long way from a deal but it’s a start. Trump demanded immediate negotiations in his speech, and it happened. I’ve long said that Trump has often said stuff that at first sounds somewhat crazy but that eventually plays out just as he predicted or planned. Greenland is clearly part of that plan.